Much in Little…

or Multum in Parvo, is the motto of England’s smallest historic county*: Rutland.  The historic counties are those administrative areas created by the Normans (though they may represent earlier shires or kingdoms) and which remained in place for nine centuries.  It has the smallest population, and in terms of area only the City of London is smaller.  To my eyes it’s an anachronism whose survival seems evidence of the influence and snobbery of its residents, largely Conservative, who have resisted attempts to absorb it into the larger county of Leicestershire.

I’ve never had any formal reason to visit the area; it’s largely agricultural, but it did achieve a sort of celebrity when former Python, Eric Idle, produced a comedy series called Rutland Weekend Television, leading to the spin-off Beatles spoof called The Rutles.  

As I was working in Leicester I opted to correct this omission, though it meant a pre-dawn start to my day to enable my trip.  My objective was the reservoir at its heart; Rutland Water.  On a summer’s day I might have gone in hope of photographing osprey fishing from the man-made lake, but on a cold November morning at first light there was no chance of this so I concentrated on another attraction.

_pw_3738-2Normanton Church is a Rutland icon, and is apparently becoming one of the most photographed buildings in England.  On one hand this is off-putting (why follow the masses?), but on the other is a challenge to try and find a new angle on the subject (quite a challenge when you have only half an hour, diffuse grey skies, and no local knowledge!).

Normanton Village was flooded to construct the reservoir in the 1970’s but the locals wished to preserve the unusual church (which reminded me a of a miniature Birmingham Cathedral) as a museum to village history and the building of the reservoir.  They did this in quite an unusual way.

Moving the  150 year old building would have been prohibitively expensive, but the position of the church, near to the proposed edge of the water, meant that it would not be completely submerged by the flooding, although the planned water levels would have been above floor level.  Ingeniously they filled the church with rubble up to the level of the windows, thereby raising the floor and then with more stone built a small peninsula in which the structure now sits.  Note that I say “in which” rather than “on which”._pw_3778_hdr

_pw_3785Some refer to the church as appearing to float on the water, though clearly the proportions bely this; it is a church that has sunk into the water, but in a way that preserves the building, and though it was deconsecrated before work began on the reservoir it has now become a very popular wedding venue with quirky low ceilings.

I didn’t have a colourful sunrise to give interest to my pictures, or the calm waters that would provide an interesting reflection of the church, so I had to work hard to get and then process a shot that I was happy with.  Without taking to the water you’re limited for angles, and most shots are taken along the peninsula or just along the shoreline.

Eventually I found my originality by going much closer for one shot…_pw_3787_hdr

and much further away for another.  Much effort in Little Rutland._pw_3738

 

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Much in Little…

  1. Excellent shots. The last one gives it an unworldly feel.
    I’d never heard of this church until now. Every corner of England seems to have something worth visiting.
    I don’t mean to be offensive to the folks who preserved it, and I suppose the structure was “saved” but it seems like odd symbolism for a wedding ceremony. Kind of a melancholy thing, the poster child for “half-hearted,” and a perfect setting for a conditional, transient marriage. On the other hand, if it weren’t for the “Venice is Sinking” setting, I guess it wouldn’t be a particularly historic or memorable structure, when England has so many amazing cathedrals, chapels, Wren churches, etc. But it certainly looks like it was a very handsome design, before it was sunk and half-buried in rocks.

    1. Thanks Robert; you’re right about the wealth of places to see here, though traditionally we haven’t been great at promoting them so a little digging is often required; part of what I enjoy about this enterprise. I read something that catches my interest and later set out to photograph it, or spot something unusual and set off to find out more. I did smile at your comments about a transient marriage which almost provoked my cynical streak to respond!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s